분류 | 상법 |
---|
Hello,
We have an Employee Dishonesty claim to make against our insurance company for a fraud case involving our (now former) employees. There are about 15 individuals who committed fraud against us, but the insurance company is grouping up the incidents as one occurrence and only willing to submit payment for only one occurrence. We believe that each case should be treated as own and not grouped together, as the employees were not working together, but worked alone and in different times / locations to obtain personal benefits at the cost of the company. Our insurance company is fighting back on this stating that this is on their policy:
d. All loss or damage:
(1) Caused by one or more persons; or
(2) Involving a single act or series of acts;
is considered one occurrence.
Our question is, how is it even determined whether something is considered one occurrence or not? The language is very unclear and vague and could possibly mean anything can be grouped under one occurrence. We would like to see is there's a possibility of fighting this and winning the case if we were to take legal action and hire a lawyer.
Thank you!
번호 | 분류 | 제목 | 글쓴이 | 조회 수 |
---|---|---|---|---|
258 | 부동산법 | Laws regarding tenants rights [1] | Kay | 566 |
257 | 부동산법 | 집 렌트관련 문의 드립니다 [1] | Osushi | 2765 |
256 | 부동산법 | 집주인이 변심으로 인한 손해배상 [1] | emily | 190 |
255 | 부동산법 | 워터히터 룸이 옆집 발코니에 있어요. [1] | sunny | 138 |
254 | 부동산법 | 안녕하세요, 아래 Kay입니다. [1] | Kay | 163 |
253 | 부동산법 | 퇴거에 관련하여 문의를 드립니다. [1] | Steve | 800 |
252 | 부동산법 | 아파트 문제 [1] | mk | 201 |
251 | 부동산법 | Airbnb [1] | DL | 4825 |
250 | 부동산법 | 집 주인이 전혀 답변을 안주고 있습니다. 도와주세요 변호사님. [1] | aol | 297 |
249 | 부동산법 | 부동산법 문의 [1] | Helen | 301 |
248 | 부동산법 | 리스 계약을 취소해주겠다고 하였으나.. [1] | aol | 2447 |
247 | 부동산법 | 3units 중 한 유닛 lease [1] | Anna | 1773 |
246 | 부동산법 | 서브리스 테넌트가 렌트비를 안내는데 거실에 시큐리티 카메라 달아도 문제 없나요 | Sean | 1108 |
245 | 부동산법 | 부동산 계약금 포기 사인 [1] | Hola | 448 |
244 | 부동산법 | lien 걸린 집을 팔수 있나요? [1] | 누렁 | 835 |
243 | 부동산법 | 상가 건물주가 공사비용을 테넌트에게 청구 [1] | Park | 355 |
242 | 부동산법 | 정확한 저의 대응방법을 알고 싶습니다. | Moon | 164 |
241 | 부동산법 | 집 렌트관련 문의사항. [1] | 미니유리 | 4727 |
240 | 부동산법 | 집 리스 계약 관련입니다. [1] | 박준형 | 252 |
239 | 부동산법 | 제 동의 없이 리스에 이름이 올라갔어요 [1] | sea | 145 |
In responding to your inquiry, please be advised that the attorney must have an opportunity to review the coverage policy to answer to your question. Generally, the coverage policy should define the terms used in the coverage. Yes, I agree with you that many cases the terms and the wordings used are ambiguous. That is why you need to hire an attorney who specializes in reviewing the insurance policy.
You can probably find a qualified attorney through online research. Sorry I am not able to assist you much.
Good luck to you.