분류 | 상법 |
---|
Hello,
We have an Employee Dishonesty claim to make against our insurance company for a fraud case involving our (now former) employees. There are about 15 individuals who committed fraud against us, but the insurance company is grouping up the incidents as one occurrence and only willing to submit payment for only one occurrence. We believe that each case should be treated as own and not grouped together, as the employees were not working together, but worked alone and in different times / locations to obtain personal benefits at the cost of the company. Our insurance company is fighting back on this stating that this is on their policy:
d. All loss or damage:
(1) Caused by one or more persons; or
(2) Involving a single act or series of acts;
is considered one occurrence.
Our question is, how is it even determined whether something is considered one occurrence or not? The language is very unclear and vague and could possibly mean anything can be grouped under one occurrence. We would like to see is there's a possibility of fighting this and winning the case if we were to take legal action and hire a lawyer.
Thank you!
번호 | 분류 | 제목 | 글쓴이 | 조회 수 |
---|---|---|---|---|
587 | 기타 | made in usa [1] | LineTech | 517 |
586 | 기타 | Business Renewal 계약 [1] | ro1027 | 223 |
585 | 기타 | 도움 요청드림니다 [1] | hello1234 | 321 |
584 | 기타 | 보행사고 보상범위 [1] | Kim | 261 |
583 | 기타 | 세입자 관련 법 [1] | Eric | 1119 |
582 | 기타 | 변호사님 문의드리고 싶어서 글을 남깁니다. [1] | 한웅진 | 506 |
581 | 기타 | 형법 관련하여 질문드립니다. [1] | 마름 | 370 |
580 | 기타 | 상해건 [1] | chow | 126 |
579 | 기타 | 비지니스 매매후 근처에서 같은일 할경우 문제 되나요? [1] | 뉴요컹 | 340 |
578 | 기타 | 폭행당했을시 [1] | skdus | 649 |
577 | 기타 | 시큐리티 디파짓 문제요 [1] | Mooose | 845 |
576 | 기타 | garage door manual open [1] | JJ | 177 |
575 | 기타 | 자동차 사고 클레임 [1] | rucy | 310 |
574 | 기타 | 사고 및 협박 [1] | dlrjtehdlrauddmfh | 177 |
573 | 기타 | 회사 관련 보험비 문제 [1] | Andie | 274 |
572 | 기타 | California 주에서 온라인 게임 사이트 개설 문의. [1] | 최수한 | 1734 |
571 | 기타 | 아르바이트를 하다가 손님에게 폭행을 당했습니다. [1] | naiaro | 221 |
570 | 기타 | 공사대금이 다갔는데 화이널 공사를 안해줍니다.. [1] | boa | 166 |
569 | 기타 | 아파트복도에서 넘어져서 다쳤어요 [1] | 5G | 312 |
568 | 기타 | conflict of interest 문제 [1] | 엔지니어 | 302 |
In responding to your inquiry, please be advised that the attorney must have an opportunity to review the coverage policy to answer to your question. Generally, the coverage policy should define the terms used in the coverage. Yes, I agree with you that many cases the terms and the wordings used are ambiguous. That is why you need to hire an attorney who specializes in reviewing the insurance policy.
You can probably find a qualified attorney through online research. Sorry I am not able to assist you much.
Good luck to you.