분류 | 상법 |
---|
Hello,
We have an Employee Dishonesty claim to make against our insurance company for a fraud case involving our (now former) employees. There are about 15 individuals who committed fraud against us, but the insurance company is grouping up the incidents as one occurrence and only willing to submit payment for only one occurrence. We believe that each case should be treated as own and not grouped together, as the employees were not working together, but worked alone and in different times / locations to obtain personal benefits at the cost of the company. Our insurance company is fighting back on this stating that this is on their policy:
d. All loss or damage:
(1) Caused by one or more persons; or
(2) Involving a single act or series of acts;
is considered one occurrence.
Our question is, how is it even determined whether something is considered one occurrence or not? The language is very unclear and vague and could possibly mean anything can be grouped under one occurrence. We would like to see is there's a possibility of fighting this and winning the case if we were to take legal action and hire a lawyer.
Thank you!
번호 | 분류 | 제목 | 글쓴이 | 조회 수 |
---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 소송 | 전 집주인과의 법적소송 및 합의 [1] | jeremy | 197 |
17 | 소송 | Fridge water leakage로 인한 손해 [1] | 꽃부리 | 121 |
16 | 소송 | 인터넷회사 고소문제 [1] | bombbohero | 124 |
15 | 소송 | HOA 에게서 2년 넘게 정신적 학대 와 협박. 압박& 따돌림 [1] | Sanfrancisco | 152 |
14 | 소송 | small claim 질문요 [1] | 선이 | 113 |
13 | 소송 | 사기를 당한 것 같습니다. 고소를 하려고 합니다. [1] | Johnny | 250 |
12 | 소송 | 엘리베이터 갇히는 사고가 있었습니다. [1] | 찌우 | 115 |
11 | 소송 | 안녕하세요 개인돈거래 상담 부탁드립니다. [1] | doja | 94 |
10 | 소송 | 회계사 실수로 인한 벌금 | mgr98 | 114 |
9 | 소송 | 안녕하세요, 문제가 생겨서 질문 드립니다. [1] | Bodyle | 101 |
8 | 소송 | 웨딩 사진사 계약 | 미나 | 101 |
7 | 소송 | 문의 [1] | egg | 132 |
6 | 소송 | 도둑이 들었습니다. [1] | easyglide | 134 |
5 | 소송 |
불법 견인
[1] ![]() | Danielcy | 145 |
4 | 소송 | AT&T Branch False Advertisement 고소가 가능 한지 궁금합니다. [1] | henrykim0213 | 148 |
3 | 소송 | 불법임대로 인한 무과실 퇴거 [1] | neo | 181 |
2 | 소송 |
천장 붕괴 및 누수
[1] ![]() | PALSON | 216 |
1 | 소송 | 미국에서 사고를 당했는데요 [1] | 로니 | 111 |
In responding to your inquiry, please be advised that the attorney must have an opportunity to review the coverage policy to answer to your question. Generally, the coverage policy should define the terms used in the coverage. Yes, I agree with you that many cases the terms and the wordings used are ambiguous. That is why you need to hire an attorney who specializes in reviewing the insurance policy.
You can probably find a qualified attorney through online research. Sorry I am not able to assist you much.
Good luck to you.